Tamara Holder Talk: Tamara Holder, Esquire
General Information

Tamara N. Holder is an Illinois defense attorney and TV/radio legal analyst. She has no shortage of opinions, many of which she shares with you here.

Criminal Defense * Criminal Record Clearing * Governor's Pardons * Discrimination * Police Brutality * Public Policy

www.xpunged.com

 



Entries in Chicago (15)

Wednesday
11Nov2009

Tamara in The Wall Street Journal: "More Job Seekers Scramble To Erase Their Criminal Past" by Douglas Belkin

The Wall Street Journal NOVEMBER 11, 2009

More Job Seekers Scramble To Erase Their Criminal Past

By DOUGLAS BELKIN

U.S. job seekers are crashing into the worst employment market in years and background checks that reach deeper than ever into their pasts.

The result: a surge of people seeking to legally clear their criminal records.

In Michigan, state police estimate they'll set aside 46% more convictions this year than last. Oregon is on track to set aside 33% more. Florida sealed and expunged nearly 15,000 criminal records in the fiscal year ended June 30, up 43% from the previous year. The courts of Cook County, which includes Chicago and nearby suburbs, received about 7,600 expungement requests in the year's first three quarters, nearly double the pace from the year before.

One petitioner is Wally Camis Jr., who wanted to clear the air about the time he threatened two men with a hairbrush.

Setting the Record Straight

Sally Ryan for The Wall Street Journal

Wally Camis Jr. works as a cook and classroom helper at a day care center in Naperville, Ill.

Mr. Camis was hungry for work amid a divorce last fall. The 41-year-old Air Force veteran, who had worked as a security guard and owned a restaurant, filled out an application for temporary employment in Eugene, Ore., checking a box saying he had never been arrested.

When he followed up a week later, the temp agency told him no thanks -- they'd turned up a 1986 conviction. Stunned, Mr. Camis recalled the night the two men threatened him and he pulled a silver brush from his back pocket, saying it was a knife. He called the police, he says, and later pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a misdemeanor. The judge entered a "no judgment" finding and ordered Mr. Camis to pay a $60 fine.

"I thought that was the end of it," he says.

Instead, 22 years later, Mr. Camis found himself fighting to erase traces of the arrest, joining the growing ranks of Americans who hope that clearing their records of minor crimes will boost their odds in a tough job market. To help, entrepreneurs have set up record-clearing services and local governments have passed laws to speed the expungement process.

Civil-rights organizations have long complained that young black men are disproportionately hindered when prospective employers ask about applicants' arrests or convictions. But attorneys say past offenses are increasingly catching up with blue-collar and middle-class applicants with solid work histories.

"This is affecting a whole new group," says Michael Hornung, a defense attorney in Fort Myers, Fla., who charges $1,000 to help clients clear records. "I've had more people come in to talk to me about having their records expunged in the last year than I have had in the previous 13 combined."

The increase comes as unemployment has risen above 10%, allowing potential employers to be choosier than they have been in decades. More Americans have criminal records now, criminologists say, in part because a generation has come of age since the start of the war on drugs.

[Tainted Resumes]

These convictions are increasingly coming to employers' attention. Background checks have become more commonplace in the years after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and cheaper. More than 80% of companies performed such checks in 2006, compared with fewer than 50% in 1998, according to the Society for Human Resource Management, an association of HR professionals.

Erased, Sealed, Blocked

Though the definition, terminology and methods of expungement vary by state, its general intent is to restore people to the legal status they enjoyed before a brush with the law -- often giving them the right to answer "no" when a prospective employer asks if they've been arrested or convicted. Most felonies, such as sexual assault or armed robberies, can't be removed. But in many states, some lesser crimes can. After a successful appeal, official records may be shredded, erased, sealed or blocked from view by anyone except entities such as police or schools.

Expungement doesn't wipe away all traces. Local news Web sites routinely post arrest mug shots, which are nearly impossible to eradicate from the Internet. Search engines can turn up a smattering of decades-old news and police reports, plus caches of newer ones. Arrests that have been legally expunged may remain on databases that data-harvesting companies offer to prospective employers; such background companies are under no legal obligation to erase them.

Some employers say background checks provide vital red flags at a time when liability fears run high. Workplace theft cost retailers $15.5 billion last year, according to the National Retail Federation. On-the-job violence costs billions in legal costs and lost work hours, says the Workplace Violence Research Institute, a California consulting firm.

"If I have a guy with four arrests and bad credit versus someone who has never been in trouble in his life, who am I going to hire? It's not rocket science," says Louis DeFalco, corporate director of safety, security and investigations at ABC Fine Wine & Spirits in Florida, which has 175 stores.

Though some employers acknowledge that workers with convictions can become trusted employees, the risk of passing over these applicants is far outweighed by the benefit of culling high-risk applicants from stacks of resumes. Companies can make hiring decisions based on conviction records, but not on arrests that haven't resulted in convictions, according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Some lawyers have created services to help clients clear records, including Chicago attorney Tamara Holder's www.xpunged.com. Legal-aid organizations have created or stepped up programs to help guide people through the process. The public defender's office in San Jose, Calif., is among public organizations using federal stimulus money to hire additional attorneys to process the influx of clients.

State lawmakers have taken note. In Pennsylvania, where the state pardons board faces a three-year backlog of record-clearing requests, Democratic Rep. Tim Solobay was author of a bill permitting local courts to process the petitions as well. It passed into law last year. This year, Mr. Solobay is pushing legislation that would expand the class of misdemeanors that can be expunged to include disorderly conduct and possession of small amounts of marijuana.

Mr. Solobay says he wrote the bill after a friend told him that his son, who was convicted of disorderly conduct in college, had been turned down for several jobs.

"It kept coming back time and again and haunting him," Mr. Solobay says of his friend's son, suggesting that eventually the punishment ceased to fit the crime. "The job market is tough enough, and he's competing against people with a clean record. So he's getting disqualified."

Millions of Americans are in a similar position. In 1967, 50% of American men had been arrested. Since then, arrests made in connection with domestic violence and illegal drugs have pushed the number to 60%, estimates Alfred Blumstein, a criminologist at Carnegie Mellon University. The annual number of arrests for possession of marijuana more than tripled to 1.8 million from 1980 to 2007, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Arrests and convictions are also easier for employers to learn about. Even 10 years ago, background checks tended to be cursory or expensive. Now, database providers can quickly access information from the country's approximately 3,100 court jurisdictions, charging $10 or less for simple checks.

One Chicago 53-year-old, who has worked for an overnight delivery service and as a bricklayer, is nervous that his record's sole smudge may come back to haunt him.

In 1974, he says, he was walking down a street near his Chicago home rolling a marijuana cigarette. He was arrested by an undercover police officer and convicted of possession. "That was back in the days when I had hair, and I just said, 'Forget about it.' I was like 17 or 18 years old -- what did I care?"

His employers never learned of the conviction, he says, nor have his own children. But, hoping to coach high-school basketball when he retires in a few years, he's working with a Chicago attorney to clear his record. "Nowadays they look for anything so I figured I better take care of this," he says.

One employer that has taken on candidates with criminal records in recent years is the U.S. military. From 2006 through 2008, the four armed-forces branches issued conduct waivers for more than 2,000 recruits with felony convictions, 3,000 recruits with felony arrests and 42,000 recruits with serious misdemeanors, according to the Department of Defense.

Now, some veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are finding their service may not make up for earlier offenses.

Osvaldo Hernandez of New York served in the Army for 15 months in Afghanistan, then, upon his return to the U.S., scored in the 98th percentile on his civil- service exam, says his attorney, Jim Harmon. Mr. Hernandez, 27, has been unable to land a job with the New York City Police Department because of a 2002 conviction of illegal possession of a gun, Mr. Harmon said.

Mr. Hernandez hasn't sought expungement because his crime doesn't qualify for it in New York. An NYPD spokesman said the department has a policy against hiring felons.

Mr. Hernandez is now serving another overseas tour, hoping "that serving twice in combat will overcome the prior conviction issue," Mr. Harmon says.

Mr. Camis, meanwhile, spent months trying to undo the legacy of one night in 1986.

Then 18, Mr. Camis was leaving his job at a movie theater in Woodridge, Ill., when he says two men threatened him. He flashed the handle of his 5-inch-long brush, he says.

The men fled. Mr. Camis says he called the police. Officers apprehended the men, who accused Mr. Camis of being the aggressor. Before a circuit court judge in Illinois's DuPage County, Mr. Camis admitted he threatened to cut the men -- assault without the battery -- and paid his fine.

'Never Had a Problem'

The next year he joined the Air Force, where he serviced F-15s in Okinawa, Japan, and earned an honorable discharge. He later worked as a guard, railroad brakeman, exterminator and restaurateur, he says, passing two criminal background checks along the way. "I never had a problem," he said.

In fall 2008, he says, he approached Cardinal Services Inc. in Oregon. An agent at the temp service said he had openings that might be suitable. Mr. Camis turned in his application.

Cardinal says it paid a background-search firm about $10 to examine his past. It turned up the DuPage no-judgment order -- which the court had posted online in 2004, among other records.

When Mr. Camis followed up with Cardinal a week after applying, he says, an agent there accused him of lying about his criminal history. Cardinal wouldn't help him find work, the agent said.

Cardinal Services' manager and general counsel Mike Lehman says the company's application asks prospective workers about arrests, as well as convictions. Mr. Lehman called Mr. Camis's denial of his arrest a "red flag."

"If someone has a criminal history, we can work with them," Mr. Lehman says. "But if they have one and lie to us, that's pretty ominous."

'No Judgment'

Mr. Camis says he had forgotten about the incident and, even when reminded, thought the "no judgment" ruling had cleared him.

A few weeks later, he called Ms. Holder of Xpunged.com. She filed an expungement petition with the DuPage court.

In April, Mr. Camis flew from Oregon to Illinois for a five-minute hearing in front of a DuPage circuit judge. The judge agreed to seal the record. Ms. Holder added that under Illinois law, Mr. Camis's charge wasn't technically a conviction.

On Sept. 8, the records supervisor of the Woodridge Police Department signed an affidavit swearing that she had shredded all identifying materials connected to case 86CM4967, "People of the State of Illinois vs. Wallace E. Camis Jr." The destroyed documents would have included the police report with details of the arrest.

Mr. Camis is back in Illinois, taking education courses and logging full-time hours at a day-care center where he is the cook and a classroom helper. He says he eventually hopes to be a teacher.

Of his police record, Mr. Camis says: "Hopefully it's gone for good."

Write to Douglas Belkin at doug.belkin@wsj.com

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A1

Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit

www.djreprints.com



Wednesday
07Oct2009

OBAMA'S "CHANGE" SCHTICK IS HEADING FOR THE WORST - RISING UNEMPLOYMENT, FALSE PROMISES

I've said this before and I'll say it again: Obama has intentionally avoided the issues facing the very same people who rallied in historical numbers to vote him into office: the poor, uneducated, jobless and minority. Time's a tickin', buddy. If you don't give the jobless jobs, your schtick on "change" won't work for round 2.

The jobless rate hit a 26-year high last month: 9.8%. Economists, including Alan Greenspan, predict unemployment rates will definitely rise beyond 10%. WSJ article here.

"President Barack Obama and the Democrats are all the more exposed on the jobs front because they touted the $787 billion economic-stimulus bill as a way to curb job losses. The Obama team asserted in January that the recovery plan would keep unemployment below 8% and push it down to nearly 7% by the end of 2010. Obama aides have since said that they didn't grasp how sour the economy was at the time."

Remember all of the blacks who registered to vote for the first time just to vote for Obama? Well, in some black neighborhoods in Chicago, unemployment is near 40%.

Obama continues to address health care and the war in Afghanistan. That's all gravy but people are soon going to start demanding answers. People want to feed their family and send their kids to school. While Obama was planning his speech before the Olympic Committee overseas, a young boy was beaten to death in the streets of Chicago. His family struggled with funeral expenses.

The stimulus money didn't work. Bailing out banks isn't the answer. Remember when three banks gave back approximately $300 million of TARP money back to the G? We must put Americans back to work. Streets and schools needs a facelift. Americans need jobs, Americans need food, Americans need education for their kids so that their kids can have jobs.

I'm beginning to think the only bailout that needs to occur is for Obama to get bailed out of taking a job that was filled with a lot of false hope.

www.xpunged.com and www.tamaraholder.com

Sunday
26Apr2009

REMEMBER WHEN I ANALYZED THEN-SENATOR OBAMA'S SPEECHES AND HOW HE LEFT OUT ALL TALK OF HELPING THE POOR? NOW PRESIDENT, HE CONTINUES TO LEAVE HELPING THE POOR OUT OF HIS AGENDA!

An article in today's Sun Times "Obama Rapped on Urban Problems" discusses a meeting that took place this weekend in Chicago with community activists.  Senator Roland Burris also made a surprise appearance. Article here. Local community activists joined to discuss their disappointment in President Obama and his apparent neglect of the poor. Well, folks, the writing was on the walls before we elected him President. Don't like saying this but, I told you so.

I have worked in the inner-city for several years now. I have worked with many of the community activists and leaders. Every Saturday before the election, it seemed as if every member of the Rainbow Push Coalition was decorated in gold Obama t-shirts and homemade pins. The Obama frenzy was in full effect on Chicago's south-side - the very same area that houses some of poorest and most violent residents of Chicago, if not in the entire country. Every Monday night, I held a clinic at Push for 3 years, helping people clear their criminal records to get jobs.  Unfortunately, the majority of the people who visited me I could not help.

So, when then-Senator Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, both gave speeches at the DNC last August, I immediately noticed that both speeches avoided the topic of the poor and I wrote about it:

AN EXCERPT FROM MY AUGUST 30, 2008 BLOG here:

Our poverty rate is over 12% ; that's disgusting. One in 100 is incarcerated; the majority of those behind bars are parents. That means the incarcerated parents cannot adequately provide for their children. That means we are punishing not just the "criminal" but the entire family of the "criminal."

People who fall within the poverty lines are NOT "working-class" nor are they "middle-class" nor are all of them lazy with no desire to "work hard." They are flat-out poor. I do not have the answers on how to fix poverty. I just know that the solution isn't simply "work-hard" or "go get a job and an education."

In the speeches, Mr. & Mrs. Obama say "work"...I lost count on his speech; Michelle says "work" about 22 times; he said "poverty" ONCE and neither said the word "poor". If you go back to the my blog, you will see a list of all the things Obama said he would do if he were elected. He does not mention helping the poor once!

SATURDAY'S MEETING OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS

Founder & President of The Black Star Project - Phil Jackson Phil Jackson (former Chicago Housing Authority Director who founded the Black Star Project) was one of the most vocal people at the meeting; he showed Senator Burris a map of the 34 Chicago Public School students killed in the last nine months — centered around a flag that marks President Obama’s home in Kenwood.

Mr. Jackson wants to see some money go toward the inner-city youth for jobs, internships and training. “When we had a summer jobs program, we were able to keep 80 children safe and off the streets,” Jackson said. “When it ended, three of them were shot. One of them was killed. We have to rebuild the black family. We need strong institutions in our community.’’

I know Mr. Jackson and I consider him a peer. He works exceptionally hard at trying to re-build familial relationships. Mr. Jackson's organization could greatly benefit from federal money - which would in turn benefit many at-risk youth. If we don't give to wonderful organizations like his, how are we going to save our youth?

President Obama, our inner-cities are suffering. Unemployment is up, incarceration is up, drop-out rates are up, murders on our streets are up. It is time to help the poor, not only the "middle-class." What are you going to do, Mr. President?

www.xpunged.com and www.tamaraholder.com

Sunday
22Mar2009

DON'T BELIEVE ALL YOU READ: THIS BLOG IS FACTUALLY INCORRECT - "California Gunman Kills Four Cops While Violating Parole - Save All the Expungement Hypocrisy!"

Anonymous "pathickey" has written another hate-filled blog about me. I don't care what he/she thinks of me per se; however, I'm bothered by the fact that the content of the blog is factually misleading. So, I'll use my blog to correct the record.

1) An expungement in IL is only for those who have arrests or non-convictions, i.e. NO convictions. You cannot expunge a felony or even a misdemeanor conviction. You cannot expunge the record of any person who served time in prison, who was on parole, who was on probation, or even someone who did county jail time. Any person who has a conviction must receive a Governor's pardon if he/she wants to expunge that conviction. So, "Pat" is wrong in saying that expunging a record puts cops in danger and protects career criminals. 

2) The IL State Police has refused to follow the chief judges' (Judge Paul Biebal & others) orders to expunge and seal records. Those granted the order are eligible for expungement or sealing per the law. If "Pat" disagrees with the law, I am not the correct person to write about. "Pat" should be upset with the legislators who wrote the expungement and sealing law. Maybe "Pat" has a better idea; maybe "Pat" should write his legislators with his/her suggestions. Question: why should not a person be able to expunge their record if they were never convicted of a crime? What is the harm?

3) I would never support the killing of any person, including the police. What "Pat" does not know is that I have met with Superintendent Weis numerous times regarding the killing of slain Chicago Police officer Jose Vazquez. Officer Vazquez was killed outside of his home a little over 2 years ago. Single gunshot to the chest. No witnesses, no suspects. This was a dispicable crime and whomever killed Officer Vazquez ought to be found. Officer Vazquez was a husband/brother/son and friend to many. My prayers go out to the families of the four police officers killed. My prayers also go out to the families of the TWENTY-NINE Chicago Public School students who have been killed this year. Gun violence must stop.

4) I welcome "Pat" and anyone else out there to meet me to discuss the various issues he/she has with me. Here's his/her blog: http://hickeysite.blogspot.com. Funny that he/she write blogs about "dangerous" people when the very subject matter of the blog itself is hate-filled and makes me wonder if this person has their own anger-management issues.  If you have something to say about me, say it to my face or at least get the facts straight; don't hide behind an anonymous blog. Come out, come out Mr. Anonymous.

Below is the FACTUALLY INCORRECT & ASSUMPTION-FILLED BLOG:

"California Gunman Kills Four Cops While Violating Parole - Save All the Expungement Hypocrisy!"

Dear God - more cops killed. The idiots in Illinois are getting all Progressive to put money in Expungment Attorney Tamara Holder's purse. She is a rising star in the scum-bag legal community - watch out G. Flint Taylor and Jon Loevy! Holder trolls for Criminals in violence racked housing projects and in the Sun Times. Holder was part of Jesse Jackson's Sleepover resulting from the drug-pinch riots at the Harold Ickes Homes a while back.

Now Tamara has Lefty journalists and Chicago's leading race-baiter at the Sun Times panning for gold on her Expungement Claim.

In California three cops were murdered by a parole violater and another officer clings to life.


Man violates parole, kills three cops in California


AP, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA
Monday, Mar 23, 2009, Page 7
A man wanted for violating his parole killed three police officers and gravely wounded another in two shootings on Saturday, the first after a routine traffic stop and the second after a massive manhunt ended in gunfire, authorities said.

The gunman was also killed.

The violence began on Saturday afternoon when two officers stopped a Buick sedan in Oakland, California, police spokesman Jeff Thomason said. The driver opened fire, killing one officer and seriously wounding the second.

The gunman then fled on foot, police said, leading to an intense manhunt by dozens of Oakland police, California Highway Patrol officers and Alameda County sheriff deputies. Streets were roped off and an entire area of east Oakland closed to traffic.

About two-and-a-half hours later, officers, acting on an anonymous tip, found the suspect barricaded inside an apartment building, police said.

Police said the gunman fired an assault rifle at officers who came into the building to arrest him. Two members of the SWAT team were killed and a third was grazed by a bullet, police said.

Acting Oakland police chief Howard Jordan said police returned fire, killing a man they identified as 26-year-old Lovelle Mixon of Oakland.

The slain officers were identified as Sergeant Mark Dunakin, 40, who was killed at the first shooting, and sergeants Ervin Romans, 43, and Daniel Sakai, 35, who were killed at the second location.

Officer John Hege, 41, was in serious condition.

Somber officers at the police station consoled each other.

“This is probably one of the worst incidents that has ever taken place in this history of the Oakland police department,” Thomason said.

“[Mixon] was on parole and he had a warrant out for his arrest for violating that parole. And he was on parole for assault with a deadly weapon,” Oakland police Deputy Chief Jeffery Israel said.

People lingered at the scene of the first shooting. About 20 bystanders taunted police.

Tension between police and the community has risen since the fatal shooting of unarmed 22-year-old Oscar Grant by a transit police officer at an Oakland train station on Jan. 1.

This past week Pop Eyed Racist and unoriginal thinker, Mary Mitchell reacting to other persons' journalism and reports( Chicago Reporter and Leftist STNG Barista Angela Caputo) shouted out this:

Because African Americans account for about 61 percent of Illinois parolees, it is the group most impacted by the arrogance of this state agency.

So, it is quite ironic that it was black community leaders who publicly supported Blagojevich during the corruption scandal that jettisoned him from office.

The failure of the Illinois State Police to expunge and seal criminal records when ordered to do so by a judge also has likely resulted in people who honestly thought they had complied with the law losing their jobs after a background check.

Also, since applying for an expungement costs $60 -- a fee that many applicants are hard-pressed to come by -- the state agency has effectively scammed these applicants when it refused to obey the judge's orders to seal or expunge the records.

Like I said, this is a mess.

One way to start unraveling it is to bring Trent before the legislative body to explain himself.

Maybe his department has been too tainted by Blagojevich's disdain for ex-offenders.

Or maybe, given an environment where no one seemed to have been in charge, Trent mistakenly thought he could play by his own rules.

Whatever the case, the agency is guilty of abusing its vast power to determine what is right from what is wrong.

The rush to expunge Criminal Records puts money in Expungment Tamara Holder's pockets, but it gets cops killed and endangers society. Tamara Holder pops up wherever Criminals in our community need more camouflage and cover. Expungment is a big help to career criminals. That must be the agenda of Angela Caputo and the writers at Chicago Reporter.

God Bless all the families of the slain officers in California and here in Illinois as well.

www.xpunged.com and www.tamaraholder.com

Sunday
08Mar2009

CHICAGO SUPERINTENDENT JODY WEIS FORCED TO TURN OVER LIST OF "REPEATER" OFFICERS WITH MULTIPLE COMPLAINTS

Superintendent Weis with Mayor Daley & Interim Superintendent Dana StarksLast week, Chicago Police Superintendent Jody Weis was found in contempt of court by a federal court judge because he refused to turn over a "repeater" list of officers who had 5 or more complaints made against them since 2002. Article here. After the ruling, Weis decided to turn the list over to opposing counsel for two minors who were beaten by an off-duty detective in 2007.

Weis will be in court tomorrow to explain why he initially refused to comply with a court order. According to the Tribune, "Weis said he still disagrees with the judge's decision because releasing the list would harm officer morale and could lead to misconceptions about officer conduct."

WEIS DOING HIS JOB: PROTECTING HIS OFFICERS

I have met with Superintendent Weis on several occasions and I must say he is an honorable man, in my opinion.  Keep in mind, Weis was just appointed Superintendent by Mayor Daley a bit over a year ago in February, 2009.  Weis is a true commander who was trained to go down for his soldiers.  On the other hand, there is one rule all must follow in court: never defy a court order.

CHICAGO POLICE MISCONDUCT SYSTEMIC

I am thrilled to know this list was forced over.  Chicago Police misconduct goes back to the days of Jon Burge torture and I'm sure well before then as well.  There is no reason officers should be protected from their misconduct.  The only way cockroaches are forced out is if they are smoked out.  Time to smoke out the bad officers.

SOME CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES CONTRIBUTE TO THE SILENCE

Often times, criminal defense attorneys seek OPS records on Chicago Police officers who made an arrest in a pending case.  For example, if my client alleges the police planted drugs on him, I may want to see if the Officer has ever received a complaint of this sort before. However, the records are not sent directly to me but to the judge's chambers.  Then, the judge gets to review all OPS complaints and make the determination if there's anything relevant to turn over.  Many judges will not turn over cases that are similar if the case was "unfounded."  That term can mean many things.  Did the police properly investigate and interview all witnesses?  I had a client who was in custody for over a year before OPS interviewed him on a complaint.  Judges don't want to go on a "fishing expedition" and look through an entire officer's file...but if the judges don't turn over the complaints, this is another form of suppressing past misconduct.

In conclusion, I am happy to know the officers accused of multiple incidents of misconduct are going to be exposed.  No more protecting the bad guys.  Not all officers are bad but taxpayers should appreciate this decision after last year $20 million dollars was paid to 4 men by the City of Chicago after they sued for Jon Burge's torture over 20 years ago.  The cost to the taxpayers and the public interest in this list far outweighs protecting these "repeater" officers. 

www.xpunged.com & www.tamaraholder.com

Tuesday
03Mar2009

REPORT: ANNUAL COST OF GUN VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO = $2.5 BILLION ANNUALLY

March 3, 2009: "Gun Violence Among School-Age Youth in Chicago" a report released by the University of Chicago Crime Lab says the annual cost of gun violence in the City of Chicago costs $2.5 billion dollars annually. Yes, that's BILLION. Article here. Other findings of the report are:
--Most of residents at the Cook County Juvenile Detention Center suffer from at least one psychiatric disorder.
--The average juvenile in custody scored lower on a vocabulary test than 95 percent of the general youth population.
--More than a third of homicide victims had alcohol in their system, while only 3 percent showed traces of "hard drugs" like heroin or cocaine in their blood.
--Four-fifths of Chicago homicide victims in 2008 died from gunshot wounds.

This new statistic bolsters my previously-held position that we have a war in our streets-at-home. So long as we continue to fight wars abroad and seek to provide "economic recovery" to the working class at home, we will continue to leave out those who have become an economic burden to our society.

$2.5 billion dollars is a staggering number. But that number is just a portion of the total cost that "gun violence" has on our community. Each indigent person must be prosecuted by the County State's Attorney and defended by the County Public Defender. Each indigent person must sit in out jails as they await trial. Each victim that survives becomes a life-long burden on society if there is serious physical disabiity and required medical attention. Each victim that does not survive must be properly buried and many times the family cannot afford the expenses.

THESE STATS ARE NOT JUST CHICAGO'S PROBLEM. THEY ARE THE NATION'S PROBLEM. 2.2 million people in our county are currently in prison or jail. Statutory minimums have been created for sentencing; the "3-strikes and you're out" laws set many up for failure. We slap first-time offenders on the wrist but severely punish on the 3rd offense. Why not punish the first time around?

Here's a comparison: Mexico's annual federal budget is 1 billion. That means the City of Chicago's gun-violence costs are 1 1/2 times greater than the ENTIRE country of Mexico's budget!  Nationally, we spend approximately $100 billion dollars annually on gun violence.

I cannot understand why society as a whole continues to ignore this immense problem.

According to the Brady Campaign:
* In 2005, approximately 8 children under the age of 19 were killed per day. 
*,694 people in the United States died from firearm-related deaths – 12,352 were murdered; 17,002 killed themselves; 789 were accidents; 330 died by police intervention, and in 221, the intent was unknown. 6 In comparison, 33,651 Americans were killed in the Korean War and 58,193 Americans were killed in the Vietnam War.

Regardless of your position on gun laws and rights, we have a serious problem with gun violence. Too many lives are lost and too much money is being spent.  Something must change.

 

www.xpunged.com and www.tamaraholder.com

 

Friday
23Jan2009

BLAGO SCHEDULED TO DO 2 RADIO INTERVIEWS TODAY

Friday, Jan. 23, 2009: IL Gov. Blagojevich is scheduled to do two radio interviews today.  The first will be on WLS at 8:30 am EST and the second will be on Cliff Kelley's show on 670 WVON at 5:00 pm EST. (Cliff is so well-respected; hence, why Blago chose to speak to him over everyone else.  Cliff is one of my closest friends and mentors. He's really the best!)  This will be a great interview. If you can't get 670 am on your radio, go to www.wvon.com and you can listen to the live stream.  You don't want to miss it!Just felt like posting a pic of Cliff and me from last year. So why not here?! He's the best.

I don't know if his attorneys advised him against speaking to the press but I'm certain he is very prepared.  On one hand, I don't think he should speak because whatever he says can be used against him in the Senate trial or in the federal criminal trial.  But, on the other hand, he knows he's going to lose the impeachment trial so what does it matter if he speaks to the press? I mean, at this point, he's probably used to being recorded!

I'm hoping he has some memorized poetry, like he has provided at recent press conferences, so that we can walk away from these interviews feeling more educated! My favorite is THE CAT IN THE HAT! Nothing too intellectual...Maybe Blago will read The Cat in the Hat to us during his interviews?

Unfortunately, Blagojevich is welcoming the attention.  He speaks to the press in the mornings before his daily jog.  Now these interviews.  He's starting to remind me of Drew Peterson: always looking for an opportunity to hop on camera.  This is not good for his image; his attorneys should advise him to stop talking to the press!

Here is my interview from Thursday, Jan. 22, 2009 on Fox Chicago discussing the issue in my previous blog: Blagojevich is will not be given an opportunity for fair trial and Due Process.

www.xpunged.com and www.tamaraholder.com